SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Ashby

Other Applicant tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Ashby does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from Ashby on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Ashby has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Ashby does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Ashby does notAshby publishes, and they do not
Jobvitejobvite.com 85/100 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list nothing Compare
Joinjoin.com 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
JazzHRjazzhr.com 65/100 1 Data processing agreement 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Workableworkable.com 65/100 1 Subprocessor list 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
iCIMSicims.com 52/100 1 Subprocessor list 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
SmartRecruiterssmartrecruiters.com 50/100 1 Subprocessor list 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Bullhornbullhorn.com 48/100 1 Subprocessor list 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Homerunhomerun.co 43/100 1 Subprocessor list 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Leverlever.co 43/100 1 Subprocessor list 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure Compare
Greenhousegreenhouse.io 35/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Pinpointpinpointhq.com 26/100 1 Subprocessor list 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 Compare
Manatalmanatal.com 43/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Uptime SLA with a figure Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.