Transparency alternatives to JazzHR
Other Applicant tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at JazzHR. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 43 that differ from JazzHR on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
JazzHR has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at JazzHR” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at JazzHR | Found at JazzHR, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jobvitejobvite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jobvite | 83/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | nothing | Compare |
| Workableworkable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Workable | 61/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| SmartRecruiterssmartrecruiters.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SmartRecruiters | 57/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated | Compare |
| Bullhornbullhorn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bullhorn | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| PrimePROprimepro.netSee also Transparency alternatives to PrimePRO | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Homerunhomerun.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Homerun | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| iCIMSicims.comSee also Transparency alternatives to iCIMS | 39/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| Joinjoin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Join | 39/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Pinpointpinpointhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pinpoint | 26/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Greenhousegreenhouse.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Greenhouse | 22/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Leverlever.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Lever | 43/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Ashbyashbyhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ashby | 35/100 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.