SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Lever

Other Applicant tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Lever. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 43 that differ from Lever on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Lever has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Lever” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at LeverFound at Lever, not found there
Jobvitejobvite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jobvite 83/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Joinjoin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Join 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
JazzHRjazzhr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to JazzHR 65/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Subprocessor list Compare
Workableworkable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Workable 61/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 Notice before subprocessors change Compare
SmartRecruiterssmartrecruiters.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SmartRecruiters 57/100 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
Bullhornbullhorn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bullhorn 48/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
PrimePROprimepro.netSee also Transparency alternatives to PrimePRO 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Homerunhomerun.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Homerun 43/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Manatalmanatal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Manatal 43/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Ashbyashbyhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ashby 35/100 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Wintrowintro.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Wintro 26/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Greenhousegreenhouse.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Greenhouse 22/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.