SaaS Ranking
Menu

TidyHQ: what they publish

tidyhq.com · Association management · checked 2026-10-28

43/100DBand D

Rank 2 of 35 in Association management, where the median is 13.

Public transparency score, not a product or security rating. Latest check: 2026-10-28. How the score works.

Evidence at a glance

Choose a check to see its source, date and scope.

Not found means not found at the addresses we checked. Not measured means we could not complete the check.

Start a vendor reviewDownload evidence (CSV)

Overview

1 day since the newest dated result, 1 since the oldest. 12 of 12 criteria have a measured result in the last 30 days. Failed checks and undated results are excluded.

Evidence freshness is a statement about our measurement and is kept apart from the transparency score, which is frozen at v1. How good our own measurement is.

Transparency labelsaas-ranking.com

TidyHQ

tidyhq.com · Association management

  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
D 43of 100 Rank 2 of 35

Published commitments4 of 9 found

Measured behaviour2 of 3 found

Checked 2026-10-28. Every line links the page we found it on. A cross means we found nothing at the addresses we checked, not that the vendor has no such document. A transparency score, not a product rating.

Downloads include all checks, source URLs, dates and the snapshot ID for your procurement file. We do not issue badges.

The label is the whole measurement in one object: every criterion with its weight, the band, and the date. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Every line in it links the page we found the result on, or lists the addresses we checked. A cross means we found nothing there, not that TidyHQ has no such document.

Where TidyHQ sits in Association management

  1. A0 0%
  2. B1 3%
  3. C0 0%
  4. D1 3%
  5. E5 14%
  6. F28 80%
35 vendors with a score; 6 more without a score because we could measure too little. Bands have fixed thresholds, see how the score works.

The band of TidyHQ is marked. Vendors without a score are the ones where we could measure too few criteria to rank them – a gap on our side, counted separately.

What TidyHQ states

The exact figures and names we read off the pages linked below, with the sentence they stand in. This is what they publish, not what we verified about their systems.

Gaps, heaviest first

✗

Data processing agreement (DPA)

weight 3 of 3

No data processing agreement found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-10-28.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://tidyhq.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://tidyhq.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://tidyhq.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://tidyhq.com/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://tidyhq.com/legal/data-processing-addendum – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://tidyhq.com/legal/gdpr – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://tidyhq.com/trust/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://tidyhq.com/privacy/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Data processing agreement in Association management: 3 of 36 companies

✗

Subprocessors: the published list

weight 3 of 3

No subprocessor list found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-10-28.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://tidyhq.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://tidyhq.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://tidyhq.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://tidyhq.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://tidyhq.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://tidyhq.com/privacy/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://tidyhq.com/legal/subprocessor-list – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Subprocessor list in Association management: 3 of 36 companies

✗

Status page with incident history

weight 2 of 3

No public status page found.

Checked 3 addresses on 2026-10-28.

Show the 3 addresses we checked
  1. https://status.tidyhq.com/ – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  2. https://tidyhq.com/status – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://tidyhq.com.statuspage.io/ – Could not be fetched: fetch failed.

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Status page with history in Association management: 4 of 38 companies

✗weight 2 of 3

Third-party requests seen on the first load, before any interaction.

  • Third-party hosts we saw on the first load 1 ahrefs.com.
    Show the exact wording

    analytics.ahrefs.com

    Read at https://tidyhq.com/

Checked 1 address on 2026-10-28.

Show the 1 address we checked
  1. https://tidyhq.com/ – third-party requests before any interaction: analytics.ahrefs.com

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: No third-party tracking before consent in Association management: 5 of 41 companies

✗

Notice before subprocessors change

weight 2 of 3

No commitment to give notice before subprocessors change found.

Checked 8 addresses on 2026-10-28.

Show the 8 addresses we checked
  1. https://tidyhq.com/legal/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://tidyhq.com/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  3. https://tidyhq.com/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://tidyhq.com/legal/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://tidyhq.com/dpa – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://tidyhq.com/legal/data-processing-agreement – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://tidyhq.com/trust/subprocessors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  8. https://tidyhq.com/legal/sub-processors – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Notice before subprocessors change in Association management: 3 of 35 companies

✗

Named privacy contact (DPO or privacy address)

weight 1 of 3

No named privacy contact found.

Checked 7 addresses on 2026-10-28.

Show the 7 addresses we checked
  1. https://tidyhq.com/legal/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  2. https://tidyhq.com/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 200)
  3. https://tidyhq.com/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  4. https://tidyhq.com/legal/privacy-policy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  5. https://tidyhq.com/legal/privacy-notice – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  6. https://tidyhq.com/trust/privacy – reached, no match (HTTP 404)
  7. https://tidyhq.com/datenschutz – reached, no match (HTTP 404)

Is this wrong? Send us the URL

Across the market: Named privacy contact in Association management: 6 of 36 companies

Evidence

The full source lists sit behind these two groups, so that the answer above stays readable.

Published, with a source 6
✓

Data location: where they say data is hosted

weight 3 of 3

The hosting location is stated on a public page.

  • Locations named next to the hosting wording Australia, Sydney. This does not establish the company’s headquarters.
    Show the 2 exact wordings

    Here's how we keep your data secure: Data Hosting & Redundancy Hosted in Australia (AWS Sydney Region) All Tidy data is hosted securely in Amazon Web Services (AWS) data centres, spe

    Read at https://tidyhq.com/security

    Here's how we keep your data secure: Data Hosting & Redundancy Hosted in Australia (AWS Sydney Region) All Tidy data is hosted securely in Amazon Web Services (AWS) data centres, specifically in

    Read at https://tidyhq.com/security

Source: https://tidyhq.com/security · checked 2026-10-28

Across the market: Data location stated in Association management: 9 of 36 companies

✓

Public pricing with figures

weight 2 of 3

Actual numbers on a public page.

Source: https://tidyhq.com/pricing · checked 2026-10-28

Across the market: Public pricing in Association management: 11 of 35 companies

✓

HTTPS enforced with HSTS

weight 2 of 3

HTTP redirects to HTTPS and the HSTS header is set.

  • HSTS max-age 63072000 seconds (730 days).
    Show the exact wording

    max-age=63072000

    Read at https://tidyhq.com/

Source: https://tidyhq.com/ · checked 2026-10-28

Across the market: HTTPS enforced with HSTS in Association management: 20 of 41 companies

✓

Certifications named (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

weight 1 of 3

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

  • Named on that page ISO/IEC 27001 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it), PCI DSS (their data centres or infrastructure), SOC 2 (not counted: the sentence does not carry it). The sentence we kept does not carry this finding on its own, so it counts in no list and no figure.
    Show the 3 exact wordings

    Tidy is not formally certified, but we follow the principles and practices outlined in ISO 27001, SOC 2, and the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) in the design of our infrastructure and operat

    Read at https://tidyhq.com/security

    eillance Biometric access controls Redundant power, HVAC, and fire suppression Payment Security PCI-DSS Compliant Payments All payments are processed via trusted payment processors with PCI-DSS Level

    Read at https://tidyhq.com/security

    idy is not formally certified, but we follow the principles and practices outlined in ISO 27001, SOC 2, and the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) in the design of our infrastructure and operations.

    Read at https://tidyhq.com/security

Source: https://tidyhq.com/security · checked 2026-10-28

Across the market: Certifications named in Association management: 2 of 38 companies

✓

Uptime SLA with a figure

weight 1 of 3

An availability commitment with a figure.

  • Highest uptime figure on that page 99 %.
    Show the exact wording

    99.0% Monthly uptime target AWS Sydney Hosted with full redundancy < 1 day Standard support response Upti

    Read at https://tidyhq.com/sla

Source: https://tidyhq.com/sla · checked 2026-10-28

Across the market: Uptime SLA with a figure in Association management: 1 of 35 companies

✓

security.txt (RFC 9116)

weight 1 of 3

Served at /.well-known/security.txt.

Source: https://tidyhq.com/.well-known/security.txt · checked 2026-10-28

Across the market: security.txt (RFC 9116) in Association management: 1 of 36 companies

History

Not enough completed runs yet to draw a line. The next runs fill this in.

Prepare your vendor review

A source is a starting point. Check the product, plan, legal entity and date before treating it as evidence for your purchase. These questions do not change the transparency score.

TidyHQ

6 found · 6 not found · 0 not measured across 12 public checks.

12 of 12 criteria have a measured result from the last 30 days. Oldest dated result: 2026-10-28.

Investigate 6 open evidence questions
  1. Data processing agreement

    Please share the current data processing agreement for the product and plan we are considering, including its annexes and signing process.

    Inspect this check
  2. Subprocessor list

    Which subprocessors apply to our product, what does each process, and in which countries? Please share the current list.

    Inspect this check
  3. Status page with history

    Where can we review incident history for the service we will use, and how do we subscribe to incident updates?

    Inspect this check
  4. No third-party tracking before consent

    Which third-party requests occur before a visitor makes a choice, and for what purpose? Please distinguish the public website from the product.

    Inspect this check
  5. Notice before subprocessors change

    How will you notify us before a subprocessor changes, with how much notice, and what response options apply to our contract?

    Inspect this check
  6. Named privacy contact

    Which privacy contact handles requests for our account, and what escalation path should we use?

    Inspect this check

Compare

A shortlist holds up to six vendors across categories and lives entirely in the address of its page: share the link, bookmark it, put it in a ticket. Nothing is stored, so we do not know it exists.