Transparency alternatives to TidyHQ
Other Association management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at TidyHQ. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 34 that differ from TidyHQ on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
TidyHQ has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at TidyHQ” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at TidyHQ | Found at TidyHQ, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild Apricotwildapricot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wild Apricot | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | 4 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Amiliaamilia.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Amilia | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Rakletraklet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Raklet | 30/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| ROC-Proc-p.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ROC-P | 22/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Membermeistermembermeister.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Membermeister | 35/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Novi AMSnoviams.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Novi AMS | 30/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| GrowthZonegrowthzone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GrowthZone | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Traction Rectractionrec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Traction Rec | 22/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Jackrabbitjackrabbitclass.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jackrabbit | 17/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Fussball.defussball.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Fussball.de | 13/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Easyvereineasyverein.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easyverein | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Vereinonlinevereinonline.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Vereinonline | 4/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.