Alternatives to UrBackup
Other Backup and recovery vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that UrBackup does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from UrBackup on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
UrBackup has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and UrBackup does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and UrBackup does not | UrBackup publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barracudabarracuda.com | 48/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Rewindrewind.com | 48/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Afiafi.ai | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Cohesitycohesity.com | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| SpinOnespin.ai | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| BorgBaseborgbase.com | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Keepitkeepit.com | 35/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Acronisacronis.com | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Redstorredstor.com | 32/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Comet Backupcometbackup.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Carbonitecarbonite.com | 22/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Commvaultcommvault.com | 22/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.