SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Druva

Other Backup and recovery vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Druva does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 20 that differ from Druva on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Druva has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Druva does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Druva does notDruva publishes, and they do not
Barracudabarracuda.com 48/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
BorgBaseborgbase.com 39/100 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Certifications named Compare
Afiafi.ai 39/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing nothing Compare
Cohesitycohesity.com 39/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history nothing Compare
Keepitkeepit.com 35/100 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Redstorredstor.com 32/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Acronisacronis.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Comet Backupcometbackup.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Carbonitecarbonite.com 22/100 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
CloudAllycloudally.com 30/100 1 Data location stated nothing Compare
Baculabaculasystems.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Commvaultcommvault.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.