SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Adam.ai

Other Board and meeting management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Adam.ai does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 22 that differ from Adam.ai on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Adam.ai has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Adam.ai does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Adam.ai does notAdam.ai publishes, and they do not
Circlebackcircleback.ai 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Certifications named Compare
Knowaknowa.co 52/100 4 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Otterotter.ai 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Firefliesfireflies.ai 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing nothing Compare
Boardableboardable.com 43/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing nothing Compare
BoardProboardpro.com 39/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Board Intelligenceboardintelligence.com 35/100 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
BoardEffectboardeffect.com 30/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Fellowfellow.app 30/100 1 Public pricing 1 Certifications named Compare
BoardSpaceboardspace.co 22/100 1 Public pricing 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
ShareVaultsharevault.com 17/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data location stated Compare
MeetingKingmeetingking.com 9/100 1 Public pricing 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.