SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to ShareVault

Other Board and meeting management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at ShareVault. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 26 that differ from ShareVault on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

ShareVault has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at ShareVault” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at ShareVaultFound at ShareVault, not found there
Otterotter.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Otter 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Circlebackcircleback.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Circleback 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Knowaknowa.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Knowa 52/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 nothing Compare
Read AIread.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Read AI 48/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 1 Certifications named Compare
Firefliesfireflies.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Fireflies 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Supernormalsupernormal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Supernormal 43/100 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
BoardProboardpro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BoardPro 39/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Boardableboardable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Boardable 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Semblysembly.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Sembly 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Process PAprocesspa.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Process PA 26/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Board Intelligenceboardintelligence.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Board Intelligence 22/100 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
BoardSpaceboardspace.coSee also Transparency alternatives to BoardSpace 22/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.