Transparency alternatives to CICOD Workflow Manager
Other Business process management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at CICOD Workflow Manager. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 36 that differ from CICOD Workflow Manager on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
CICOD Workflow Manager has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at CICOD Workflow Manager” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at CICOD Workflow Manager | Found at CICOD Workflow Manager, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sorocosoroco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Soroco | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Temporaltemporal.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Temporal | 39/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Signaviosignavio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Signavio | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Emakinemakin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Emakin | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Kestra Cloudkestra.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Kestra Cloud | 30/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Flowableflowable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flowable | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Viflowviflow.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Viflow | 22/100 | 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Cardanitcardanit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cardanit | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Skanskan.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Skan | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Aureaaurea.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aurea | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Qprqpr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Qpr | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Apromoreapromore.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to Apromore | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.