SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Apromore

Other Business process management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Apromore does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from Apromore on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Apromore has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Apromore does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Apromore does notApromore publishes, and they do not
Temporaltemporal.io 35/100 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Sorocosoroco.com 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Signaviosignavio.com 35/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Skanskan.ai 35/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Flowableflowable.com 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Mehrwerkmehrwerk.eu 22/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Celoniscelonis.com 17/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
KIEkie.apache.org 17/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Bizagibizagi.com 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Fluxiconfluxicon.com 13/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Ibm Bpmibm.com 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Aureaaurea.com 26/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.