SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Apromore

Other Business process management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Apromore. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 36 that differ from Apromore on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Apromore has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Apromore” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at ApromoreFound at Apromore, not found there
Temporaltemporal.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Temporal 39/100 6 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Sorocosoroco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Soroco 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Kestra Cloudkestra.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Kestra Cloud 30/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Signaviosignavio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Signavio 35/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Skanskan.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Skan 35/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Flowableflowable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Flowable 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Viflowviflow.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Viflow 22/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data location stated Compare
Cardanitcardanit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cardanit 35/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Emakinemakin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Emakin 30/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Celoniscelonis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Celonis 17/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Chronos Workflowchronosworkflow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chronos Workflow 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
CICOD Workflow Managercicod.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CICOD Workflow Manager 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.