Transparency alternatives to Complinity
Other Compliance automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Complinity. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 59 that differ from Complinity on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Complinity has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Complinity” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Complinity | Found at Complinity, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secureframesecureframe.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Secureframe | 83/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Keelkeelgrc.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Keel | 78/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Vantavanta.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vanta | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| LogicGatelogicgate.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LogicGate | 68/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Hyperproofhyperproof.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Hyperproof | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Whisticwhistic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Whistic | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Optrooptro.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Optro | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| UpGuardupguard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to UpGuard | 39/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Conveyorconveyor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Conveyor | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Certacerta.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Certa | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| ProcessUnityprocessunity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ProcessUnity | 39/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Akitraakitra.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Akitra | 30/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.