SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Starface

Other Contact centre vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Starface does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 22 that differ from Starface on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Starface has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Starface does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Starface does notStarface publishes, and they do not
CloudTalkcloudtalk.io 61/100 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +4 nothing Compare
Aircallaircall.io 61/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
JustCalljustcall.io 43/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Nextivanextiva.com 43/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Genesysgenesys.com 26/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Diabolocomdiabolocom.com 30/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Squaretalksquaretalk.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Dakteladaktela.com 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Odigoodigo.com 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Enreachenreach.com 13/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Five9five9.com 13/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
NICEnice.com 13/100 2 Public pricing, Certifications named nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.