SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Armo

Other Container and cloud workload security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Armo does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 17 that differ from Armo on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Armo has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Armo does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Armo does notArmo publishes, and they do not
Docker Scoutdocker.com 43/100 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 1 Status page with history Compare
Socketsocket.dev 48/100 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Upwindupwind.io 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Endor Labsendorlabs.com 39/100 4 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Chainguardchainguard.dev 30/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Status page with history Compare
Anchoreanchore.com 26/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Status page with history Compare
Prisma Cloudprismacloud.io 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Nirmatanirmata.com 22/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Sweet Securitysweet.security 17/100 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Status page with history Compare
Cast AIcast.ai 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Status page with history Compare
Isovalentisovalent.com 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Status page with history Compare
Fairwindsfairwinds.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Status page with history Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.