SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Isovalent

Other Container and cloud workload security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Isovalent does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 16 that differ from Isovalent on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Isovalent has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Isovalent does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Isovalent does notIsovalent publishes, and they do not
Socketsocket.dev 48/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 1 Data location stated Compare
Upwindupwind.io 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Docker Scoutdocker.com 43/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 nothing Compare
Endor Labsendorlabs.com 39/100 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Nirmatanirmata.com 22/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Sweet Securitysweet.security 17/100 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Chainguardchainguard.dev 30/100 1 Public pricing nothing Compare
Anchoreanchore.com 26/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Prisma Cloudprismacloud.io 26/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Armoarmosec.io 9/100 1 Status page with history 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Kubexkubex.ai 4/100 1 Certifications named 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Cast AIcast.ai 22/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.