SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Jano Technologies

Other Court case management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Jano Technologies does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 13 that differ from Jano Technologies on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Jano Technologies has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Jano Technologies does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Jano Technologies does notJano Technologies publishes, and they do not
One Legalonelegal.com 30/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
equivantequivant.com 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Conduent Courtsconduent.com 10/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
CourtCallcourtcall.com 9/100 1 Public pricing 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Journal Technologiesjournaltech.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Netsentialnetsential.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
File & ServeXpressfileandservexpress.com 4/100 1 Certifications named 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
For The Recordfortherecord.com 4/100 1 Certifications named 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Kofilekofile.com 4/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Cardinal Courtcardinaltracking.com 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
eFileTexasefiletexas.gov 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare
JAVSjavs.com 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 No third-party tracking before consent Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.