SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Conduent Courts

Other Court case management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Conduent Courts. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 17 that differ from Conduent Courts on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Conduent Courts has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Conduent Courts” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Conduent CourtsFound at Conduent Courts, not found there
One Legalonelegal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to One Legal 30/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
equivantequivant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to equivant 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Verbit Courtsverbit.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Verbit Courts 17/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Daily Journaldailyjournal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Daily Journal 17/100 1 Public pricing nothing Compare
TrusteSolutionstrustesolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TrusteSolutions 13/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
US Legal Supportuslegalsupport.comSee also Transparency alternatives to US Legal Support 13/100 1 Data location stated 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
VIQ Solutionsviqsolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to VIQ Solutions 13/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
CourtCallcourtcall.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CourtCall 9/100 1 Public pricing 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Jano Technologiesjanotech.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jano Technologies 9/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
File & ServeXpressfileandservexpress.comSee also Transparency alternatives to File & ServeXpress 4/100 1 Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
For The Recordfortherecord.comSee also Transparency alternatives to For The Record 4/100 1 Certifications named 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Kofilekofile.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kofile 4/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.