SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to equivant

Other Court case management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that equivant does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 13 that differ from equivant on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

equivant has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and equivant does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and equivant does notequivant publishes, and they do not
One Legalonelegal.com 30/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Conduent Courtsconduent.com 10/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
CourtCallcourtcall.com 9/100 1 Public pricing 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Jano Technologiesjanotech.com 9/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Journal Technologiesjournaltech.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Netsentialnetsential.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
File & ServeXpressfileandservexpress.com 4/100 1 Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
For The Recordfortherecord.com 4/100 1 Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Kofilekofile.com 4/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Data location stated Compare
Cardinal Courtcardinaltracking.com 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
eFileTexasefiletexas.gov 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
JAVSjavs.com 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.