Transparency alternatives to Verbit Courts
Other Court case management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Verbit Courts. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 18 that differ from Verbit Courts on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Verbit Courts has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Verbit Courts” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Verbit Courts | Found at Verbit Courts, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One Legalonelegal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to One Legal | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| CourtCallcourtcall.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CourtCall | 9/100 | 1 Public pricing | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| equivantequivant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to equivant | 17/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| TrusteSolutionstrustesolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TrusteSolutions | 13/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| US Legal Supportuslegalsupport.comSee also Transparency alternatives to US Legal Support | 13/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| VIQ Solutionsviqsolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to VIQ Solutions | 13/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Conduent Courtsconduent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Conduent Courts | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| File & ServeXpressfileandservexpress.comSee also Transparency alternatives to File & ServeXpress | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Journal Technologiesjournaltech.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Journal Technologies | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Netsentialnetsential.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Netsential | 9/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| For The Recordfortherecord.comSee also Transparency alternatives to For The Record | 4/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kofilekofile.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kofile | 4/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.