SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to For The Record

Other Court case management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that For The Record does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 12 that differ from For The Record on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

For The Record has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and For The Record does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and For The Record does notFor The Record publishes, and they do not
One Legalonelegal.com 30/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Certifications named Compare
equivantequivant.com 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
Conduent Courtsconduent.com 10/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Certifications named Compare
CourtCallcourtcall.com 9/100 1 Public pricing 1 Certifications named Compare
Jano Technologiesjanotech.com 9/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 1 Certifications named Compare
Journal Technologiesjournaltech.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Certifications named Compare
Netsentialnetsential.com 9/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Certifications named Compare
Kofilekofile.com 4/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare
File & ServeXpressfileandservexpress.com 4/100 nothing we found there and not here nothing Compare
Cardinal Courtcardinaltracking.com 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Certifications named Compare
eFileTexasefiletexas.gov 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Certifications named Compare
JAVSjavs.com 0/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.