Transparency alternatives to For The Record
Other Court case management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at For The Record. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 18 that differ from For The Record on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
For The Record has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at For The Record” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at For The Record | Found at For The Record, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One Legalonelegal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to One Legal | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Daily Journaldailyjournal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Daily Journal | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| equivantequivant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to equivant | 17/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Verbit Courtsverbit.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Verbit Courts | 17/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| TrusteSolutionstrustesolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TrusteSolutions | 13/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| US Legal Supportuslegalsupport.comSee also Transparency alternatives to US Legal Support | 13/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| VIQ Solutionsviqsolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to VIQ Solutions | 13/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Conduent Courtsconduent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Conduent Courts | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| CourtCallcourtcall.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CourtCall | 9/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Jano Technologiesjanotech.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jano Technologies | 9/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Journal Technologiesjournaltech.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Journal Technologies | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Netsentialnetsential.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Netsential | 9/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.