Data location stated in IT service management
Where the data sits decides who can demand access to it and whether a transfer is one at all. It does not by itself decide which privacy law applies.
8 of 31 companies we measured here publish it, that is 26%. Last checked 2026-10-16.
26% here against 24% across every category we measure. IT service management sits above the overall share for this criterion.
This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.
Back to Data location stated across all categories, or to IT service management.
- Found8
- Not found at checked addresses23
- Not measured2
33 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.
Published
The hosting location is stated on a public page.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| GLPI | https://www.glpi-project.org/en/privacy-policy/Checked |
| Ivanti | https://www.ivanti.com/company/legal/privacy-policyChecked |
| Jitbit | https://www.jitbit.com/privacy/Checked |
| ManageEngine | https://www.manageengine.com/privacy.htmlChecked |
| OTRS | https://otrs.com/privacy-policy/Checked |
| Siit | https://www.siit.io/complianceChecked |
| SysAid | https://www.sysaid.com/privacy-policyChecked |
| Xurrent | https://www.xurrent.com/securityChecked |
No statement about data location found.
We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Alloy Software | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| Atlassian | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| Atomicwork | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| Cireson | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| Deepser | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| Dreamtsoft | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| EasyVista | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| Genuity | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| HaloITSM | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| InvGate | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| Issuetrak | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| iTop | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| Matrix42 | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| Motadata | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| Rezolve | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| SapphireIMS | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| Serviceaide | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| SimplyDesk | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| SiteHelpDesk | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| SolarWinds | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| TOPdesk | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| Track-It | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
| Vivantio | 7 addresses checkedChecked |
Not measured
We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| ServiceNow | The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked |
| Spiceworks | The vendor’s robots.txt excludes us from at least one of these addresses, so this was not measured.Checked |
Other criteria in IT service management
- Data processing agreement
- Subprocessor list
- Status page with history
- Public pricing
- Certifications named
- Uptime SLA with a figure
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS
- No third-party tracking before consent
- security.txt (RFC 9116)
- Notice before subprocessors change
- Named privacy contact
Data location stated in related categories
Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.