SaaS Ranking

Data location stated in SIEM and security operations

Where the data sits decides who can demand access to it and whether a transfer is one at all. It does not by itself decide which privacy law applies.

8 of 39 companies we measured here publish it, that is 21%. Last checked 2026-10-18.

21% here against 24% across every category we measure. SIEM and security operations sits below the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to Data location stated across all categories, or to SIEM and security operations.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found8
  • Not found at checked addresses31
  • Not measured3

42 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

The hosting location is stated on a public page.

VendorWhat we found
Devo https://devo.com/privacyChecked
Expel https://expel.com/notices/Checked
Gigamon https://www.gigamon.com/privacy-policy.htmlChecked
Hunters https://www.hunters.security/privacy-policyChecked
Huntress https://www.huntress.com/privacy-policyChecked
Ontinue https://www.ontinue.com/privacy-policy/Checked
Securonix https://www.securonix.com/privacy-policy/Checked
Todyl https://www.todyl.com/privacyChecked
No statement about data location found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Anvilogic 7 addresses checkedChecked
Arctic Wolf 7 addresses checkedChecked
Atomicorp Atomic OSSEC 7 addresses checkedChecked
Blumira 7 addresses checkedChecked
Corelight 7 addresses checkedChecked
Corner Bowl Cloud SIEM 7 addresses checkedChecked
Coro 7 addresses checkedChecked
CrowdSec 7 addresses checkedChecked
Cybereason 7 addresses checkedChecked
Cyberwatch 7 addresses checkedChecked
Cynet 7 addresses checkedChecked
Deepwatch 7 addresses checkedChecked
eSentire 7 addresses checkedChecked
Exabeam 7 addresses checkedChecked
Filigran 7 addresses checkedChecked
Kaspersky 7 addresses checkedChecked
Netwitness 7 addresses checkedChecked
Nomios 7 addresses checkedChecked
Panther 7 addresses checkedChecked
Red Canary 7 addresses checkedChecked
Security Onion 7 addresses checkedChecked
SEKOIA 7 addresses checkedChecked
Stellar Cyber 7 addresses checkedChecked
Suricata 7 addresses checkedChecked
Tehtris 7 addresses checkedChecked
Trend Micro 7 addresses checkedChecked
Upstream Security 7 addresses checkedChecked
Uptycs 7 addresses checkedChecked
Vectra AI 7 addresses checkedChecked
Wazuh 7 addresses checkedChecked
WithSecure 7 addresses checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
ExtraHop The vendor’s robots.txt excludes us from at least one of these addresses, so this was not measured.Checked
Hurukai The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Trellix The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked

Other criteria in SIEM and security operations

Data location stated in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.