Data processing agreement in SIEM and security operations
Without a published DPA you cannot review the contract before you talk to sales.
8 of 39 companies we measured here publish it, that is 21%. Last checked 2026-10-18.
21% here against 11% across every category we measure. SIEM and security operations sits above the overall share for this criterion.
This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.
Back to Data processing agreement across all categories, or to SIEM and security operations.
- Found8
- Not found at checked addresses31
- Not measured3
42 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.
Published
Published and readable without a login.
No data processing agreement found.
We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| Anvilogic | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Arctic Wolf | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Atomicorp Atomic OSSEC | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Blumira | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Corelight | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Corner Bowl Cloud SIEM | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| CrowdSec | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Cybereason | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Cyberwatch | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Deepwatch | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Devo | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| eSentire | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Exabeam | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Filigran | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Gigamon | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Hunters | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Huntress | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Kaspersky | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Netwitness | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Nomios | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Ontinue | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Red Canary | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Security Onion | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| SEKOIA | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Stellar Cyber | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Suricata | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Tehtris | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Todyl | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Upstream Security | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Uptycs | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
| Wazuh | 8 addresses checkedChecked |
Not measured
We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.
| Vendor | What we found |
|---|---|
| ExtraHop | The vendor’s robots.txt excludes us from at least one of these addresses, so this was not measured.Checked |
| Hurukai | The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked |
| Trellix | The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked |
Other criteria in SIEM and security operations
- Subprocessor list
- Data location stated
- Status page with history
- Public pricing
- Certifications named
- Uptime SLA with a figure
- HTTPS enforced with HSTS
- No third-party tracking before consent
- security.txt (RFC 9116)
- Notice before subprocessors change
- Named privacy contact
Data processing agreement in related categories
Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.