SaaS Ranking

Named privacy contact in SIEM and security operations

"Contact us" is not a privacy contact. A named officer or a dedicated address is.

19 of 39 companies we measured here publish it, that is 49%. Last checked 2026-10-18.

49% here against 36% across every category we measure. SIEM and security operations sits above the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to Named privacy contact across all categories, or to SIEM and security operations.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found19
  • Not found at checked addresses20
  • Not measured3

42 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

VendorWhat we found
Anvilogic https://www.anvilogic.com/legal/privacy-policyChecked
Blumira https://www.blumira.com/privacy-policyChecked
Corelight https://corelight.com/legal/privacyChecked
Coro https://www.coro.net/legal/privacyChecked
CrowdSec https://www.crowdsec.net/privacy-policyChecked
Cybereason https://www.levelblue.com/legal/privacy-policyChecked
Cynet https://www.cynet.com/privacy-policy/Checked
Expel https://expel.com/notices/Checked
Filigran https://filigran.io/privacy-policyChecked
Gigamon https://www.gigamon.com/privacy-policy.htmlChecked
Hunters https://www.hunters.security/privacy-policyChecked
Huntress https://www.huntress.com/privacy-policyChecked
Kaspersky https://www.kaspersky.com/web-privacy-policyChecked
Ontinue https://www.ontinue.com/privacy-policy/Checked
Trend Micro https://www.trendmicro.com/de_de/about/trust-center/privacy.htmlChecked
Upstream Security https://upstream.io/privacy-policy/Checked
Uptycs https://www.uptycs.com/privacy-policyChecked
Vectra AI https://www.vectra.ai/legal/privacy-policyChecked
Wazuh https://wazuh.com/privacy-policy/Checked
No named privacy contact found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Arctic Wolf 7 addresses checkedChecked
Atomicorp Atomic OSSEC 7 addresses checkedChecked
Corner Bowl Cloud SIEM 7 addresses checkedChecked
Cyberwatch 7 addresses checkedChecked
Deepwatch 7 addresses checkedChecked
Devo 7 addresses checkedChecked
eSentire 7 addresses checkedChecked
Exabeam 7 addresses checkedChecked
Netwitness 7 addresses checkedChecked
Nomios 7 addresses checkedChecked
Panther 7 addresses checkedChecked
Red Canary 7 addresses checkedChecked
Security Onion 7 addresses checkedChecked
Securonix 7 addresses checkedChecked
SEKOIA 7 addresses checkedChecked
Stellar Cyber 7 addresses checkedChecked
Suricata 7 addresses checkedChecked
Tehtris 7 addresses checkedChecked
Todyl 7 addresses checkedChecked
WithSecure 7 addresses checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
ExtraHop The vendor’s robots.txt excludes us from at least one of these addresses, so this was not measured.Checked
Hurukai The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Trellix The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked

Other criteria in SIEM and security operations

Named privacy contact in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.