SaaS Ranking

Named privacy contact in SIEM and security operations

"Contact us" is not a privacy contact. A named officer or a dedicated address is.

12 of 17 vendors we measured here publish it, that is 71%. Last checked 2026-09-03.

71% here against 41% across every category we measure. SIEM and security operations sits above the overall share for this criterion.

Back to Named privacy contact across all categories, or to SIEM and security operations.

Published

A data protection officer or a dedicated privacy address is named.

VendorWhat we found
Anvilogic https://www.anvilogic.com/legal/privacy-policy
Blumira https://www.blumira.com/privacy-policy
Corelight https://corelight.com/legal/privacy
Cybereason https://www.cybereason.com/privacy-notice
Exabeam https://www.exabeam.com/legal/privacy-policy/
Filigran https://filigran.io/privacy-policy
Gigamon https://www.gigamon.com/privacy-policy.html
Hunters https://www.hunters.security/privacy-policy
Huntress https://www.huntress.com/privacy-policy
Red Canary https://redcanary.com/privacy-policy/
Trend Micro https://www.trendmicro.com/ja_jp/about/legal/privacy-policy.html
Vectra AI https://www.vectra.ai/legal/privacy-policy

No named privacy contact found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Arctic Wolf 7 addresses checked
Devo 7 addresses checked
Panther 7 addresses checked
Stellar Cyber 7 addresses checked
Todyl 7 addresses checked

Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
ExtraHop The vendor’s robots.txt excludes us from at least one of these addresses, so this was not measured.

Found something we missed? Tell us and the next run picks it up.