SaaS Ranking

Certifications named in SIEM and security operations

Naming SOC 2 or ISO 27001 publicly is the low bar; not naming them is a signal.

19 of 40 companies we measured here publish it, that is 48%. Last checked 2026-10-18.

48% here against 24% across every category we measure. SIEM and security operations sits above the overall share for this criterion.

This page counts companies, not product entries: a company with two products in this category is one company here and two rows below.

Back to Certifications named across all categories, or to SIEM and security operations.

The evidence at a glance
  • Found19
  • Not found at checked addresses21
  • Not measured2

42 companies in total. Unmeasured companies are excluded from the published share.

Published

SOC 2 or ISO 27001 named on a public page.

VendorWhat we found
Anvilogic https://trust.anvilogic.com/Checked
Arctic Wolf https://arcticwolf.com/compliance/Checked
Atomicorp Atomic OSSEC https://atomicorp.com/compliance/Checked
Blumira https://www.blumira.com/securityChecked
Coro https://www.coro.net/complianceChecked
Cynet https://trust.cynet.com/Checked
Deepwatch https://www.deepwatch.com/trust/Checked
Exabeam https://www.exabeam.com/company/trusted-and-secure/Checked
Expel https://expel.com/security-compliance/Checked
ExtraHop https://trust.extrahop.com/Checked
Gigamon https://trust.gigamon.com/Checked
Huntress https://trust.huntress.com/Checked
Panther https://panther.com/company/trustChecked
Red Canary https://compliance.zscaler.com/Checked
SEKOIA https://trust.sekoia.com/Checked
Trend Micro https://www.trendmicro.com/en_us/about/trust-center/compliance.html?utm_campaign=VURL:USA-_-Archive-_-Archive-_-complianceChecked
Upstream Security https://upstream.io/security-compliance/Checked
Uptycs https://www.uptycs.com/about/securityChecked
WithSecure https://trust.withsecure.com/Checked
No named certification found.

We reached at least one address for each of these vendors and none of them carried it. That is what we found at the addresses we checked, on the date we checked them, and not a statement about what the vendor has.

VendorWhat we found
Corelight 6 addresses checkedChecked
Corner Bowl Cloud SIEM 6 addresses checkedChecked
CrowdSec 6 addresses checkedChecked
Cybereason 6 addresses checkedChecked
Cyberwatch 6 addresses checkedChecked
Devo 6 addresses checkedChecked
eSentire 6 addresses checkedChecked
Filigran 6 addresses checkedChecked
Hunters 6 addresses checkedChecked
Kaspersky 6 addresses checkedChecked
Netwitness 6 addresses checkedChecked
Nomios 6 addresses checkedChecked
Ontinue 6 addresses checkedChecked
Security Onion 6 addresses checkedChecked
Securonix 6 addresses checkedChecked
Stellar Cyber 6 addresses checkedChecked
Suricata 6 addresses checkedChecked
Tehtris 6 addresses checkedChecked
Todyl 6 addresses checkedChecked
Vectra AI 6 addresses checkedChecked
Wazuh 6 addresses checkedChecked
Not measured

We could not look at these, or their robots.txt asks us not to. That says something about our measurement, not about them, and they are left out of the percentage above.

VendorWhat we found
Hurukai The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked
Trellix The vendor’s server blocked or rate-limited our crawler, so this was not measured.Checked

Other criteria in SIEM and security operations

Certifications named in related categories

Found something we missed? Tell us. A correction moves that vendor into our next nightly run. That run reads the same fixed addresses we check for every vendor, not the address you send.