SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Solidatus

Other Data catalogs and governance vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Solidatus. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 24 that differ from Solidatus on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Solidatus has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Solidatus” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at SolidatusFound at Solidatus, not found there
Metaplanemetaplane.devSee also Transparency alternatives to Metaplane 48/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 1 Data location stated Compare
Bigeyebigeye.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bigeye 35/100 5 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 1 Data location stated Compare
Anomaloanomalo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anomalo 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 nothing Compare
Privaceraprivacera.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Privacera 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Satorisatoricyber.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Satori 43/100 4 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 nothing Compare
Immutaimmuta.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Immuta 39/100 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Preciselyprecisely.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Precisely 30/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Validiovalidio.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Validio 30/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Varonisvaronis.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Varonis 17/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact 1 Data location stated Compare
Lightuplightup.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Lightup 35/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Datagalaxydatagalaxy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Datagalaxy 22/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
DataHubdatahub.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DataHub 22/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Data location stated Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.