Transparency alternatives to Nimbleway
Other Data integration vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Nimbleway does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 48 that differ from Nimbleway on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Nimbleway has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Nimbleway does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Nimbleway does not | Nimbleway publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estuaryestuary.dev | 65/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Prefectprefect.io | 65/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Matillionmatillion.com | 61/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Hevo Datahevodata.com | 52/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Weldweld.app | 57/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Keboolakeboola.com | 52/100 | 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| MigrationWizbittitan.com | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Snowplowsnowplow.io | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Redpandaredpanda.com | 39/100 | 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Ducodu.co | 35/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Astronomerastronomer.io | 52/100 | 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Integrate.iointegrate.io | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.