Transparency alternatives to ImageKit
Other Digital asset management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at ImageKit. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from ImageKit on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
ImageKit has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at ImageKit” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at ImageKit | Found at ImageKit, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cloudinarycloudinary.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cloudinary | 64/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Frontifyfrontify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Frontify | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Bynderbynder.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bynder | 39/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Uploadcareuploadcare.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Uploadcare | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Imgiximgix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Imgix | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Massetgetmasset.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Masset | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Brandfolderbrandfolder.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brandfolder | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Airair.incSee also Transparency alternatives to Air | 36/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | nothing | Compare |
| Sitecore Content Hubsitecore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sitecore Content Hub | 35/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Aprimoaprimo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aprimo | 30/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Censharecenshare.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Censhare | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Filecampfilecamp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Filecamp | 23/100 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.