SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Scaleflex

Other Digital asset management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Scaleflex. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 36 that differ from Scaleflex on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Scaleflex has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Scaleflex” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at ScaleflexFound at Scaleflex, not found there
Cloudinarycloudinary.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cloudinary 64/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Frontifyfrontify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Frontify 61/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Sitecore Content Hubsitecore.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sitecore Content Hub 35/100 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Filecampfilecamp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Filecamp 23/100 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Imgiximgix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Imgix 43/100 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Massetgetmasset.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Masset 43/100 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Brandfolderbrandfolder.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brandfolder 39/100 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Bynderbynder.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bynder 39/100 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Airair.incSee also Transparency alternatives to Air 36/100 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure nothing Compare
Aprimoaprimo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aprimo 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Censharecenshare.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Censhare 30/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Uploadcareuploadcare.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Uploadcare 30/100 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.