Transparency alternatives to Broadsign
Other Digital signage vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Broadsign. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 54 that differ from Broadsign on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Broadsign has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Broadsign” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Broadsign | Found at Broadsign, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Play Digital Signageplaysignage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Play Digital Signage | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Yodeckyodeck.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Yodeck | 65/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| ScreenCloudscreencloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ScreenCloud | 57/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Appspaceappspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Appspace | 52/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Pickcelpickcel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pickcel | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | Compare |
| Rocket Alumnirocketalumnisolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rocket Alumni | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Navorinavori.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Navori | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Wallboardwallboard.infoSee also Transparency alternatives to Wallboard | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Onsignonsign.tvSee also Transparency alternatives to Onsign | 35/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Disedise.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dise | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| viewneoviewneo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to viewneo | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| OptiSignsoptisigns.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OptiSigns | 26/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.