Alternatives to Play Digital Signage
Other Digital signage vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Play Digital Signage does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from Play Digital Signage on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Play Digital Signage has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Play Digital Signage does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Play Digital Signage does not | Play Digital Signage publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appspaceappspace.com | 65/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Poppulopoppulo.com | 61/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Broadsignbroadsign.com | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| ScreenCloudscreencloud.com | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Carouselcarouselsignage.com | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Disedise.com | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Navorinavori.com | 39/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Onsignonsign.tv | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| TelemetryTVtelemetrytv.com | 30/100 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| NoviSignnovisign.com | 35/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| OptiSignsoptisigns.com | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Screenlyscreenly.io | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.