SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Play Digital Signage

Other Digital signage vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Play Digital Signage. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 54 that differ from Play Digital Signage on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Play Digital Signage has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Play Digital Signage” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Play Digital SignageFound at Play Digital Signage, not found there
ScreenCloudscreencloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ScreenCloud 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Appspaceappspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Appspace 52/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Poppulopoppulo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Poppulo 48/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 Compare
Yodeckyodeck.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Yodeck 65/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Pickcelpickcel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pickcel 48/100 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Broadsignbroadsign.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Broadsign 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 Compare
Wallboardwallboard.infoSee also Transparency alternatives to Wallboard 39/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Onsignonsign.tvSee also Transparency alternatives to Onsign 35/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Revel Digitalreveldigital.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Revel Digital 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 Compare
Rocket Alumnirocketalumnisolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rocket Alumni 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Xiboxibo.org.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to Xibo 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Carouselcarouselsignage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Carousel 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact 3 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.