Transparency alternatives to Flexscreen
Other Digital signage vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Flexscreen. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 48 that differ from Flexscreen on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Flexscreen has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Flexscreen” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Flexscreen | Found at Flexscreen, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yodeckyodeck.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Yodeck | 65/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Appspaceappspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Appspace | 52/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Poppulopoppulo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Poppulo | 48/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| ScreenCloudscreencloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ScreenCloud | 48/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Rocket Alumnirocketalumnisolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rocket Alumni | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Xiboxibo.org.ukSee also Transparency alternatives to Xibo | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Broadsignbroadsign.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Broadsign | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Navorinavori.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Navori | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Carouselcarouselsignage.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Carousel | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| NoviSignnovisign.comSee also Transparency alternatives to NoviSign | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Disedise.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dise | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Onsignonsign.tvSee also Transparency alternatives to Onsign | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.