Alternatives to Screenly
Other Digital signage vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Screenly does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 25 that differ from Screenly on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Screenly has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Screenly does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Screenly does not | Screenly publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appspaceappspace.com | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Poppulopoppulo.com | 61/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Broadsignbroadsign.com | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| ScreenCloudscreencloud.com | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Carouselcarouselsignage.com | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Navorinavori.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| NoviSignnovisign.com | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| TelemetryTVtelemetrytv.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Disedise.com | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Onsignonsign.tv | 30/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| viewneoviewneo.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Fugofugo.ai | 22/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.