Transparency alternatives to Netpresenter
Other Digital signage vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Netpresenter does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 53 that differ from Netpresenter on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Netpresenter has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Netpresenter does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Netpresenter does not | Netpresenter publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yodeckyodeck.com | 65/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Appspaceappspace.com | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Poppulopoppulo.com | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Broadsignbroadsign.com | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Rocket Alumnirocketalumnisolutions.com | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| ScreenCloudscreencloud.com | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Xiboxibo.org.uk | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Carouselcarouselsignage.com | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Navorinavori.com | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| NoviSignnovisign.com | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Onsignonsign.tv | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| PosterBookingposterbooking.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.