Transparency alternatives to Anyrow
Other Document AI and data capture vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Anyrow. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 39 that differ from Anyrow on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Anyrow has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Anyrow” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Anyrow | Found at Anyrow, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypatoshypatos.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Hypatos | 65/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Parseurparseur.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Parseur | 65/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Docsumodocsumo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Docsumo | 52/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Formxformx.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Formx | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Mindeemindee.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mindee | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Veryfiveryfi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Veryfi | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Abbyyabbyy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Abbyy | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Bdo Digitalocrolus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bdo Digital | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Instabaseinstabase.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Instabase | 30/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Affindaaffinda.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Affinda | 50/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Nanonetsnanonets.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nanonets | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Deepsetdeepset.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Deepset | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.