Transparency alternatives to iKAN Cloud AP
Other Document AI and data capture vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at iKAN Cloud AP. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 37 that differ from iKAN Cloud AP on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
iKAN Cloud AP has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at iKAN Cloud AP” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at iKAN Cloud AP | Found at iKAN Cloud AP, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypatoshypatos.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Hypatos | 65/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| Parseurparseur.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Parseur | 52/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Formxformx.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Formx | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Mindeemindee.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mindee | 57/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Nanonetsnanonets.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nanonets | 57/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Docsumodocsumo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Docsumo | 52/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Anyrowanyrow.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Anyrow | 48/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Veryfiveryfi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Veryfi | 48/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Affindaaffinda.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Affinda | 63/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Upstageupstage.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Upstage | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Abbyyabbyy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Abbyy | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Deepsetdeepset.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Deepset | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.