Transparency alternatives to Tome
Other Document collaboration vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Tome does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from Tome on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Tome has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Tome does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Tome does not | Tome publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FigJamfigma.com | 87/100 | 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +6 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Preziprezi.com | 73/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Createlycreately.com | 70/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Pitchpitch.com | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Stormboardstormboard.com | 52/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| MindMeistermindmeister.com | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Conceptboardconceptboard.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Lucidchartlucid.co | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Muralmural.co | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Beautiful.aibeautiful.ai | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Cacoonulab.com | 35/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
| Klaxoonklaxoon.com | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.