Transparency alternatives to Learningbank
Other E-learning authoring vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Learningbank. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 31 that differ from Learningbank on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Learningbank has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Learningbank” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Learningbank | Found at Learningbank, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aristarist.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Arist | 65/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +4 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Courseboxcoursebox.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Coursebox | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Immerseimmerse.onlineSee also Transparency alternatives to Immerse | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Lectoraelblearning.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lectora | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Ottolearnottolearn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ottolearn | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Easygeneratoreasygenerator.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easygenerator | 36/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Geniallygenially.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Genially | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Motive.iomotive.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Motive.io | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Simxsimxvr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Simx | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Attensiattensi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Attensi | 22/100 | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Dominknowdominknow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dominknow | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Virtivirti.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Virti | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.