SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Mini Course

Other E-learning authoring vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Mini Course. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 30 that differ from Mini Course on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Mini Course has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Mini Course” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Mini CourseFound at Mini Course, not found there
Aristarist.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Arist 52/100 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 nothing Compare
Immerseimmerse.onlineSee also Transparency alternatives to Immerse 48/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Lectoraelblearning.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lectora 43/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Courseboxcoursebox.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Coursebox 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named nothing Compare
Easygeneratoreasygenerator.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easygenerator 41/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Geniallygenially.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Genially 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named 1 Public pricing Compare
Simxsimxvr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Simx 26/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Attensiattensi.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Attensi 22/100 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Ottolearnottolearn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ottolearn 39/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history nothing Compare
ClickLearnclicklearn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ClickLearn 30/100 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Vectorsolutionsvectorsolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vectorsolutions 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Public pricing Compare
Dominknowdominknow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dominknow 26/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.