Transparency alternatives to ActiveCampaign
Other Email marketing vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at ActiveCampaign. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 32 that differ from ActiveCampaign on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
ActiveCampaign has 3 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at ActiveCampaign” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at ActiveCampaign | Found at ActiveCampaign, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CleverReachcleverreach.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CleverReach | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| Mailgunmailgun.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mailgun | 83/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Mailchimpmailchimp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mailchimp | 57/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Customer.iocustomer.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Customer.io | 78/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| EmailOctopusemailoctopus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EmailOctopus | 70/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Buttondownbuttondown.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Buttondown | 61/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Omnisendomnisend.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Omnisend | 57/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Kitkit.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kit | 48/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | Compare |
| Elastic Emailelasticemail.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elastic Email | 43/100 | 1 Data location stated | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Brevobrevo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Brevo | 36/100 | 1 Data location stated | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| MailBlustermailbluster.comSee also Transparency alternatives to MailBluster | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | Compare |
| Mailcoachmailcoach.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Mailcoach | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +4 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.