SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Mailgun

Other Email marketing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Mailgun does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 20 that differ from Mailgun on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Mailgun has 2 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Mailgun does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Mailgun does notMailgun publishes, and they do not
Mailchimpmailchimp.com 57/100 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) 6 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 Compare
Customer.iocustomer.io 80/100 1 Subprocessor list 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
ActiveCampaignactivecampaign.com 78/100 1 Subprocessor list 2 Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Klaviyoklaviyo.com 65/100 1 Subprocessor list 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent Compare
Omnisendomnisend.com 57/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 Compare
CleverReachcleverreach.com 48/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 Compare
Campaign Monitorcampaignmonitor.com 17/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 Compare
EmailOctopusemailoctopus.com 43/100 nothing we found there and not here 6 Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 Compare
Substacksubstack.com 38/100 nothing we found there and not here 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Elastic Emailelasticemail.com 35/100 nothing we found there and not here 6 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 Compare
Postmarkpostmarkapp.com 35/100 nothing we found there and not here 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Flodeskflodesk.com 26/100 nothing we found there and not here 7 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +4 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.