SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Customer.io

Other Email marketing vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Customer.io does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 20 that differ from Customer.io on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Customer.io has 3 gaps in what we could measure: Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Customer.io does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Customer.io does notCustomer.io publishes, and they do not
Mailgunmailgun.com 83/100 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent 1 Subprocessor list Compare
CleverReachcleverreach.com 48/100 2 No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 Compare
ActiveCampaignactivecampaign.com 78/100 1 Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Public pricing Compare
Mailchimpmailchimp.com 57/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Omnisendomnisend.com 57/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Campaign Monitorcampaignmonitor.com 17/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 Compare
Klaviyoklaviyo.com 65/100 nothing we found there and not here 1 Data location stated Compare
EmailOctopusemailoctopus.com 43/100 nothing we found there and not here 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named Compare
Substacksubstack.com 38/100 nothing we found there and not here 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 Compare
Elastic Emailelasticemail.com 35/100 nothing we found there and not here 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 Compare
Postmarkpostmarkapp.com 35/100 nothing we found there and not here 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 Compare
Flodeskflodesk.com 26/100 nothing we found there and not here 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.