Transparency alternatives to Riot
Other Email security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Riot does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 37 that differ from Riot on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Riot has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and Riot does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Riot does not | Riot publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Red Siftredsift.com | 83/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Hoxhunthoxhunt.com | 61/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Valimailvalimail.com | 48/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| KnowBe4knowbe4.com | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| dmarciandmarcian.com | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | Compare |
| SoSafesosafe-awareness.com | 57/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 3 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Abnormalabnormalsecurity.com | 48/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Pauboxpaubox.com | 48/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Cofensecofense.com | 39/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| PowerDMARCpowerdmarc.com | 35/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| Sendmarcsendmarc.com | 35/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| EasyDMARCeasydmarc.com | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.