SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Abnormal

Other Email security vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Abnormal. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 38 that differ from Abnormal on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Abnormal has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Abnormal” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at AbnormalFound at Abnormal, not found there
URIportsuriports.comSee also Transparency alternatives to URIports 70/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
MailRoutemailroute.netSee also Transparency alternatives to MailRoute 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 Compare
SoSafesosafe-awareness.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SoSafe 65/100 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing 3 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Red Siftredsift.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Red Sift 83/100 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Riottryriot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Riot 65/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 1 Status page with history Compare
Pauboxpaubox.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Paubox 48/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Cofensecofense.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cofense 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 Compare
KnowBe4knowbe4.comSee also Transparency alternatives to KnowBe4 39/100 2 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change Compare
dmarciandmarcian.comSee also Transparency alternatives to dmarcian 35/100 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 Compare
Material Securitymaterial.securitySee also Transparency alternatives to Material Security 35/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 Compare
Supedsuped.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Suped 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 Compare
Hoxhunthoxhunt.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hoxhunt 61/100 1 Data processing agreement 1 Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.