SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Hoxhunt

Other Email security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Hoxhunt does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Hoxhunt on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Hoxhunt has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Hoxhunt does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Hoxhunt does notHoxhunt publishes, and they do not
KnowBe4knowbe4.com 52/100 3 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Red Siftredsift.com 83/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
dmarciandmarcian.com 48/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 Compare
Pauboxpaubox.com 48/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Valimailvalimail.com 48/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
MailRoutemailroute.net 35/100 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 Compare
Abnormalabnormalsecurity.com 61/100 1 Named privacy contact 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Cofensecofense.com 39/100 1 Named privacy contact 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Egressegress.com 39/100 1 Named privacy contact 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Darktracedarktrace.com 35/100 1 Named privacy contact 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 Compare
Material Securitymaterial.security 35/100 1 Public pricing 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 Compare
EasyDMARCeasydmarc.com 30/100 1 Public pricing 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.