SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Cofense

Other Email security vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Cofense does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Cofense on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Cofense has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Cofense does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Cofense does notCofense publishes, and they do not
Hoxhunthoxhunt.com 74/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 1 Named privacy contact Compare
KnowBe4knowbe4.com 52/100 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Red Siftredsift.com 83/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 nothing Compare
Abnormalabnormalsecurity.com 61/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 1 Data processing agreement Compare
Pauboxpaubox.com 48/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Valimailvalimail.com 48/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
EasyDMARCeasydmarc.com 30/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Darktracedarktrace.com 35/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Material Securitymaterial.security 35/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Hornetsecurityhornetsecurity.com 26/100 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
IRONSCALESironscales.com 22/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare
Zivverzivver.com 22/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.