Transparency alternatives to Energycap
Other Energy management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Energycap. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 34 that differ from Energycap on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Energycap has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Energycap” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Energycap | Found at Energycap, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Densitydensity.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Density | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Measurablmeasurabl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Measurabl | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Deepkideepki.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deepki | 33/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Envelioenvelio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Envelio | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Gridxgridx.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Gridx | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Meteocontrolmeteocontrol.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Meteocontrol | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Arbncoarbnco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arbnco | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Butlrbutlr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Butlr | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Arcadiaarcadia.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Arcadia | 22/100 | 1 Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Gridpointgridpoint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gridpoint | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Centinelcentinelre.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Centinel | 17/100 | 1 Public pricing | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kiwigridkiwigrid.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kiwigrid | 17/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.