SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Pulley

Other Equity and cap table management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Pulley does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 28 that differ from Pulley on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Pulley has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Pulley does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Pulley does notPulley publishes, and they do not
Cartacarta.com 70/100 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
Hiivehiive.com 35/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Certifications named Compare
Certentcertent.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Companistocompanisto.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Fairmintfairmint.com 26/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Levaleva.pe 17/100 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Bunchbunch.capital 30/100 1 Data location stated 1 Certifications named Compare
Ledgyledgy.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 1 Public pricing Compare
Sydecarsydecar.io 26/100 1 Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Allocationsallocations.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Gustgust.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Qapitaqapita.com 22/100 1 Named privacy contact 1 Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.