SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Leva

Other Equity and cap table management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Leva. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Leva on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Leva has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Leva” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at LevaFound at Leva, not found there
Cartacarta.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Carta 70/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
Cake Equitycakeequity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cake Equity 35/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Sydecarsydecar.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Sydecar 26/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Pulleypulley.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pulley 22/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Bunchbunch.capitalSee also Transparency alternatives to Bunch 30/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Hiivehiive.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hiive 30/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Ledgyledgy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ledgy 26/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Qapitaqapita.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Qapita 22/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Allocationsallocations.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Allocations 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Sharesightsharesight.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sharesight 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Vestdvestd.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vestd 17/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Companistocompanisto.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Companisto 26/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.