SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Leva

Other Equity and cap table management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Leva does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from Leva on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Leva has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Leva does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Leva does notLeva publishes, and they do not
Cartacarta.com 70/100 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 nothing Compare
Hiivehiive.com 39/100 4 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Cake Equitycakeequity.com 22/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Bunchbunch.capital 30/100 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Ledgyledgy.com 26/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Nasdaq Private Marketnasdaqprivatemarket.com 17/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Certentcertent.com 26/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Companistocompanisto.com 26/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Fairmintfairmint.com 26/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Aescuvestaescuvest.eu 22/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Allocationsallocations.com 22/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Gustgust.com 22/100 1 Public pricing 1 Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.