Transparency alternatives to Easee
Other EV charging software vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Easee. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 38 that differ from Easee on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Easee has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Easee” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Easee | Found at Easee, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Driivzdriivz.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Driivz | 35/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Zeplugzeplug.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zeplug | 22/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Virtavirta.globalSee also Transparency alternatives to Virta | 26/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Hubjecthubject.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hubject | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Chargepricechargeprice.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Chargeprice | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Ellielli.ecoSee also Transparency alternatives to Elli | 17/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Go-ego-e.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Go-e | 17/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Montamonta.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Monta | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Ampecoampeco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ampeco | 13/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Kebakeba.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Keba | 13/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Chargepointchargepoint.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chargepoint | 32/100 | 1 Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Reevreev.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reev | 30/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.